| A
government agent trains Cody Banks in the ways of covert operations
that require younger participants.[TRAILER]
STEVEN
SNYDER'S REVIEW
Just
as many Hollywood films are tiresome, watered-down remakes of far better
foreign films, “Agent Cody
Banks” is a bland and condescending adaptation of an adult action
film for a younger audience.
I’m telling everyone at MGM Pictures right now: kids don’t
like being spoken down to.
The best children’s films, from “The Wizard of Oz” to “Shrek,” don’t
pander to children, but work hard to create a fictional world that
both kids and adults can be absorbed by. The themes of these films
may appear to be simple, but there is the same complexity and depth
at work here as one would expect from “The Hours” or “Saving
Private Ryan.” “E.T.” is a classic example.
Directly
thanks to its depth, addressing issues that range from death to divorce,
it is a work that touches the very fears and concerns of the adolescent
experience.
And with that bias towards children’s films, I went into “Agent
Cody Banks.” Banks (Frankie Muniz) is a student in elementary
school, trained one summer by the C.I.A. as a ruthless super spy. He
was then returned to his family, who knew nothing of his training,
only to wait for the day his country would need his help.
That day arrives when an evil henchman abducts a renowned scientist,
Dr. Connors (Martin Donovan), creator of a vicious breed of tiny Nanobots
that can be programmed to eat away and destroy just about anything.
As one might expect, these bots pose a threat to national security.
To infiltrate this organization, Banks must attempt to get close to
Connors’ daughter, Natalie (Hilary Duff), and learn her father’s
secrets.
The fun moments of this film (and there are indeed some) concern Banks
being the kid that he is. To get closer to Natalie, Banks must put
the moves on a girl, and his bashful side is a hilarious reminder of
those youthful days when our hearts jumped into our throats at the
mere thought of the opposite sex.
It is also humorous to watch this young child become an important personality
within the C.I.A. A security guard prevents Banks from entering a room,
and is berated by the C.I.A. director. Banks is given a treasure’s
trove of high-tech gadgetry, a la James Bond. An agency crew actually
does Banks’ chores so he can focus on his job.
Yes, these moments could occur in any fish-out-of-water tale, but in “Agent
Cody Banks,” they are handled skillfully and receive the laughs
they deserve. The serious problem I had with the film, however, was
that these moments occur far too sporadically. For the twenty minutes
we get to see Banks as just a normal kid going through extraordinary
situations, there are another 80 minutes that strip him of this entertaining
identity.
Banks’ mission drains the movie of its very character. He leaves
school, initiates surveillance, achieves some death-defying escapes,
and then returns for a final, explosive confrontation. But, filmmakers,
please realize, if we wanted to see this, we would go to James Bond, “XXX” or
any Jackie Chan production.
A children’s film, by its very nature, promises something different—interesting
characters, some innocent fun and an experience the whole family can
enjoy. But Banks, on his mission, could be absolutely anyone. There
is nothing unique here. No ingenious plans by a child thinking out
of the box. No slick escapes by a child using his size and speed to
his advantage. No, nothing at all that would begin to make “Banks” a
unique moviegoing experience.
Instead, Banks becomes the standard superhero of movie land. He defeats
his much larger adversaries with insane, accelerated, implausible martial
arts. He uses gadgets rather than opening his mouth. Perhaps the screenwriters
should have interviewed some actual children for a few fresh ideas.
As the explosive climax begins, and Banks not only saves the world
but gets the girl (was there any doubt), its flaws are glaring. There
is nothing to care about, laugh at, or remember. It’s almost
as if director Harald Zwart deliberately wanted the last third of the
film to erase any memory of Banks’ better moments.
And I cannot end without an observation regarding its suitability for
the family. There is no way “Agent Cody Banks” should have
been rated PG. Sure, it’s a film about a kid, and its star, Muniz,
will be best known by younger moviegoers thanks to his “Malcolm
In The Middle” fame. But the appalling violence exhibited by
these children, the scandalous, revealing outfits worn by Banks’ boss
Ronica (Angie Harmon), which truly devalue this grown woman, and the
gruesome deaths of the film’s baddies, where Nanobots are shown
consuming their bodies from the inside out, is all just too much.
Not only is “Agent Cody Banks” uninteresting. For some
parents and grandparents with accompanying youngsters, it may also
be unwelcome.

Check out Reviews, Commentary, and More at Zertinet.com |

MOVIE
WEB PAGE
LINKS
TO REVIEWS
IMDB
WEB PAGE
MOVIE
REVIEW QUERY ENGINE
Showtimes |